“Me” songs vs. “God” songs in worship

I’ve been ruined. For one of my classes I read and wrote about the criteria for choosing songs used in worship. One of those criteria considers whether a song (or “song set”) is “me-centered” or “God-centered.” The other day I was asked if there wasn’t room in church to sing a song about what God has done for me. It’s a very good question.

We live in a consumerist, materialist culture. Nearly every choice I make in a day centers on what I like or don’t like. Scrolling through my Facebook feed I decide every second whether or not I like a post enough to stop and read. Watching American Idol(or any other talent show) I judge what I like or don’t like. Every commercial, every song, every route I drive to work, every incoming phone call, every fast-food restaurant, I decide what I like or don’t like. This mindset is the reality and totality of our existence, like a fish surrounded with water. For ten thousand minutes every week, life is about “me.”

So when we walk through the doors of our church we are still in this mode of reference. We constantly judge the experience according to what I like or don’t like. The songs we sing, the volume of the music, the style of the preacher, the perfume of the person sitting next to me, the cute (or not so cute) child two rows back, the temperature, the comfort of the seats, and a hundred other things.

I contend that for the seventy-five minutes the church is gathered in one place (set against the ten thousand they spend not gathered), we must do everything in our power to set our attention on the only reality that truly matters. That reality is that that the God of inestimable excellence in glory, holiness, and love has invited us into his presence. He chooses to speak to us, he chooses to listen to us, he chooses us to be his people. In the words of John Jefferson Davis, “The ecclesia,the assembly of the living God, the true church, is that entity constituted by those people elected and called by God, assembled by his authority in his presence to experience and respond to his presence in the worship-event.”[1]

Notice the only defined human activities in the above statement are to assemble, experience, and respond. It’s not a response that rates the event or the environment. It is a response to the One who invited us into this event, the One who delights to interact with his chosen people. The only “rating” that should happen is to assess the worth of the One before whom we assemble.  For seventy-five minutes we have the opportunity to focus our fickle attention on the God of inestimable excellence. We worship pastors must do all in our power to counter the ten-thousand minutes of self-centeredness, and have laser-like focus for these seventy-five minutes on our God.

Davis continues to examine what is the nature of an individual Christian. Once we are in Christ, we are no longer an “autonomous, individualistic self, but a trinitarian and ecclesial self.” [2]To put in plainer English, when we are saved we enter into the unique community of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Triune God inhabits us (John 14:16, 23). These words are spoken over us in our baptism. Baptism also ushers us into the body of Christ constituted in the church. While we remain individuals, we are now individuals in relation to Christ and his body. Think of a married couple: while they remain a man and woman, in their new condition of marriage they are one person. Same with the individual in Christ. He or she is indeed an individual, but now is identified in relation to the Triune God and the body of Christ, the church. So Paul can write, “You are not your own, for you were bought with a price” (1 Cor. 6:19-20).

So back to the question of songs that focus on what God has done for me; are they the best songs to use in our 75 minutes together? Chew on the above thoughts and we’ll continue soon. Tell me what you think here.

 

[1]John Jefferson Davis, Worship and the Reality of God: An Evangelical Theology of Real Presence(Downer’s Grove, IVP Academic, 2010), 62-63.

[2]Davis, Worship,71,

The New “Blended Worship”

When I was looking for a full-time worship leading gig 10 years ago I told myself I would only work in a church that had always been “contemporary.” I did not want to handle the craziness of a church in transition from “traditional” (meaning organ, choir, hymns) to “contemporary” (meaning drums & guitars, new worship choruses or hymns arranged for band.) I avoided a church with two types of services where there was always a tension between the two. I also avoided the “blended” service with both organ/choir and band, where half the people were happy half the time

Riverwood was the perfect fit. Contemporary since the beginning, wide age range but everyone, young and old, knew what the music was like and chose to make this their church home, either because of the music or in spite of the music. Some came for the preaching and tolerated the music. Others liked the music more than the preaching. Still others actually liked both. And we all got along.

Just when I thought I avoided the worship wars of the 70’s and 80’s when “Jesus music” was rising, now I’m wondering if that change is happening again. “Contemporary” has always been a moving target. As styles change in culture so does contemporary music in church. A song that was contemporary 20 years ago is almost traditional now. A style that was cutting edge 10 years ago is now “retro.” While some churches are still “traditional traditional” (or TT) with hymns, organs & choirs attended by mostly seniors, more are what I call  “traditional contemporary” (TC) with newer songs played by 40+ year-old players/singers (like me!) appealing to a broader age range. Then there’s the “new contemporary,” (NC) with very edgy songs played by 20-somethings for other 20-30-somethings.

So now if you have a church of seniors & a few younger, do “TT.” If you want primarily 20-30’s, do “NC.” For the broader age range it seems you must have “TC.” Many churches solve this by offering several styles in different venues…an 8:30 TT, 10:00 TC and Saturday/Sunday night NC services. The congregation ends up segregated by style. Seems exactly where we were 20-30 years ago!

Here’s the question: is this TC style the new “blended” where half the people are happy half the time? Here’s why I ask…

I’ve always tried my best to pick songs with singable melodies, not-too-wide range and good theology. Many are heard on the radio so people who listen to Moody radio, The Fish or K-Love will be familiar with them. My goal is to pick songs that engage the hearts of the people and allow them to express the truths of the song to God. I also try to bridge the range of teen to senior citizen who attend the same service. But lately I hear comments from people about how they observe many people at my church not singing to the music that we’re doing. They should be participating by singing but they don’t. The seniors don’t seem to like the newer songs. The teens-20’s do. This Sunday we sang “Come Thou Fount Of Every Blessing.” My pastor & I were talking today about how, whenever we do a hymn arrangement, people seem to sing out more. Is it because of familiarity? Because the older members engage more? Or are hymns still the language of the vast majority of church-goers, young and old?

Anyway, I’d like your thoughts. I’m not looking for a pat on the back & a “You’re doing great, Bill.” This isn’t fishing for affirmation. I’d genuinely like to hear your thoughts on the ever-changing landscape of worship music.

  • What type of music helps you engage in worship?
  • Is inter-generational worship valuable with a mix of styles?
  • Or do you prefer your style with your own generation?
  • Do you worship to newer songs? Give me your favorite.
  • Is traditional contemporary the new blended, with all the pros/cons that go with it?

Thanks for helping me process all this.

Talk to me…

Bill